0.06/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 960 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 120 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 02:55:27 EDT 2022 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.21/0.47 Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving 0.21/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.21/0.48 # Version: 3.0pre003-ho 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA. 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 600s (5) cores 0.21/0.50 # Starting sh2lt with 120s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 120s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 120s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # post_as_ho5 with pid 15502 completed with status 0 0.21/0.50 # Result found by post_as_ho5 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA. 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 600s (5) cores 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true) 0.21/0.50 # ...ProofStateSinE()=1/2 0.21/0.50 # Search class: HGUNF-FFSF11-MHHFFMBN 0.21/0.50 # partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total) 0.21/0.50 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 325s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 61s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 55s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 55s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 55s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # post_as_ho5 with pid 15507 completed with status 0 0.21/0.50 # Result found by post_as_ho5 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA. 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 600s (5) cores 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true) 0.21/0.50 # ...ProofStateSinE()=1/2 0.21/0.50 # Search class: HGUNF-FFSF11-MHHFFMBN 0.21/0.50 # partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 600 seconds (600 total) 0.21/0.50 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 325s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 61s (1) cores 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.21/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.21/0.50 0.21/0.50 # Proof found! 0.21/0.50 # SZS status Theorem 0.21/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_22, type, esk1_0: a > a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_23, type, esk2_0: a > a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_24, type, esk3_0: a > a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_25, type, esk4_1: ((a > a) > $o) > a > a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_26, type, esk5_1: ((a > a) > $o) > a > a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_27, type, epred1_0: (a > a) > $o). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_28, type, esk6_0: a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_29, type, esk7_0: a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_30, type, esk8_1: (a > a) > a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_31, type, esk9_0: a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_32, type, esk10_0: a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_33, type, esk11_0: a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_34, type, esk12_0: a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_35, type, esk13_0: a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_36, type, esk14_0: a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_37, type, esk15_0: a). 0.21/0.50 thf(decl_38, type, esk16_0: a). 0.21/0.50 thf(cTHM135_pme, conjecture, ![X1:a > a, X2:a > a, X3:a > a]:(((![X4:(a > a) > $o]:(((X4 @ X2)<=((X4 @ (^[X5:a]:(X5)))&![X6:a > a]:(((X4 @ (^[X7:a]:(X1 @ (X6 @ X7))))<=(X4 @ X6))))))&![X4:(a > a) > $o]:((((X4 @ (^[X5:a]:(X5)))&![X6:a > a]:(((X4 @ (^[X7:a]:(X1 @ (X6 @ X7))))<=(X4 @ X6))))=>(X4 @ X3))))=>![X4:(a > a) > $o]:(((X4 @ (^[X7:a]:(X2 @ (X3 @ X7))))<=((X4 @ (^[X5:a]:(X5)))&![X6:a > a]:(((X4 @ X6)=>(X4 @ (^[X7:a]:(X1 @ (X6 @ X7))))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM135_pme)). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:a > a, X2:a > a, X3:a > a]:(((![X4:(a > a) > $o]:((((X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(Z0)))&![X6:a > a]:(((X4 @ X6)=>(X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(X1 @ (X6 @ Z0)))))))=>(X4 @ X2)))&![X4:(a > a) > $o]:((((X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(Z0)))&![X6:a > a]:(((X4 @ X6)=>(X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(X1 @ (X6 @ Z0)))))))=>(X4 @ X3))))=>![X4:(a > a) > $o]:((((X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(Z0)))&![X6:a > a]:(((X4 @ X6)=>(X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(X1 @ (X6 @ Z0)))))))=>(X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(X2 @ (X3 @ Z0))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM135_pme])])])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X20:(a > a) > $o, X22:(a > a) > $o, X25:a > a]:((((((X20 @ (esk4_1 @ X20))|~(X20 @ (^[Z0:a]:(Z0)))|(X20 @ esk2_0))&(~(X20 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk1_0 @ (esk4_1 @ X20 @ Z0))))|~(X20 @ (^[Z0:a]:(Z0)))|(X20 @ esk2_0)))&(((X22 @ (esk5_1 @ X22))|~(X22 @ (^[Z0:a]:(Z0)))|(X22 @ esk3_0))&(~(X22 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk1_0 @ (esk5_1 @ X22 @ Z0))))|~(X22 @ (^[Z0:a]:(Z0)))|(X22 @ esk3_0))))&(((epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:(Z0)))&(~(epred1_0 @ X25)|(epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk1_0 @ (X25 @ Z0))))))&~(epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk2_0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X4:(a > a) > $o]:(((X4 @ (esk5_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ esk3_0)|~((X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(Z0)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:(Z0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a > a]:(((epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk1_0 @ (X1 @ Z0))))|~((epred1_0 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0 @ (esk5_1 @ epred1_0))|(epred1_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X4:(a > a) > $o]:(((X4 @ esk3_0)|~((X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk1_0 @ (esk5_1 @ X4 @ Z0)))))|~((X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(Z0)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk1_0 @ (esk5_1 @ epred1_0 @ Z0))))|(epred1_0 @ esk3_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X4:(a > a) > $o]:(((X4 @ (esk4_1 @ X4))|(X4 @ esk2_0)|~((X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(Z0)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ esk3_0), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8]), c_0_4])])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk2_0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk4_1 @ (^[Z1:a > a]:((epred1_0 @ (^[Z2:a]:(Z1 @ (esk3_0 @ Z2)))))) @ (esk3_0 @ Z0)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10]), c_0_11])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X4:(a > a) > $o]:(((X4 @ esk2_0)|~((X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk1_0 @ (esk4_1 @ X4 @ Z0)))))|~((X4 @ (^[Z0:a]:(Z0)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:(esk1_0 @ (esk4_1 @ (^[Z1:a > a]:((epred1_0 @ (^[Z2:a]:(Z1 @ (esk3_0 @ Z2)))))) @ (esk3_0 @ Z0))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_12])). 0.21/0.50 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14]), c_0_10])]), c_0_11]), ['proof']). 0.21/0.50 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.21/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 2 0.21/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses : 7 0.21/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7 0.21/0.50 # Processed clauses : 69 0.21/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.21/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0 0.21/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 69 0.21/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.21/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.21/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.21/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 13 0.21/0.50 # Generated clauses : 133 0.21/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 97 0.21/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.21/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.21/0.50 # Paramodulations : 94 0.21/0.50 # Factorizations : 0 0.21/0.50 # NegExts : 11 0.21/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 4 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.21/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.21/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.21/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.21/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 48 0.21/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 22 0.21/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.21/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 5 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 21 0.21/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 40 0.21/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 78 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 21 0.21/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 45 0.21/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 40 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.21/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4 0.21/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 107 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 2 0.21/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.21/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0 0.21/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 12082 0.21/0.50 0.21/0.50 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.015 s 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.002 s 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.017 s 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1884 pages 0.21/0.50 0.21/0.50 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.064 s 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.007 s 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.072 s 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages 0.21/0.50 EOF